Geopolitical Risk and Global Marketing Adaptation: Strategic Responses to the Strait of Hormuz Disruption
Main Article Content
Abstract
The increasing frequency of geopolitical tensions has created significant challenges for multinational corporations operating in global markets. One of the most critical geopolitical concerns is the potential disruption of the Strait of Hormuz, a strategic maritime route that plays a vital role in international trade and energy transportation. This study examines the impact of Strait of Hormuz disruptions on global supply chains and marketing strategies, with a particular focus on the adaptation mechanisms adopted by multinational corporations. Using a qualitative approach based on literature review and case study analysis, the study synthesizes recent findings from academic publications and international reports related to geopolitical risk, supply chain resilience, and global marketing adaptation. The findings indicate that disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz can increase transportation costs, create supply uncertainty, and generate logistics challenges that affect business operations and market performance. These disruptions also influence marketing activities, particularly in pricing, product management, distribution, and customer communication. In response, multinational corporations increasingly implement resilience-oriented strategies, including supplier diversification, regional sourcing, alternative logistics networks, and digital supply chain management. The study further highlights the importance of integrating supply chain resilience and marketing adaptation to maintain competitiveness in uncertain business environments. The proposed framework suggests that effective adaptation strategies enable firms to mitigate geopolitical risks, strengthen business resilience, and sustain long-term competitive advantage. This study contributes to the literature on international business and global marketing by providing an integrated perspective on the relationship between geopolitical risk and organizational adaptation.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Belhadi, A., Kamble, S., Subramanian, N., Singh, R. K., & Venkatesh, M. (2024). Digital capabilities to manage agri-food supply chain uncertainties and build supply chain resilience during compounding geopolitical disruptions. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 44(11), 1914–1950. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-11-2022-0737
Bozonelos, D., & Tsagdis, D. (2023). From fragmented geopolitics to geopolitical resilience in international business. AIB Insights, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.46697/001c.73803
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Caldara, D., & Iacoviello, M. (2022). Measuring geopolitical risk. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1194–1225. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20191823
Celestin, M., & Sujatha, S. (2024). Impact of global supply chain disruptions on business resilience: Strategies for adapting to pandemics and geopolitical conflicts. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Engineering and Technology, 9(2), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13887198
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Dau, L. A., Moore, E. M., & Newburry, W. (2023). Building international business and societal resilience in an uncertain global environment. AIB Insights, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.46697/001c.82224
Estrin, S., & Hancké, B. (2026). How geopolitics, geoeconomics, and new organizational models are changing the world of business. Journal of International Business Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-026-00246-w
Patricia, J., Wulandari, D. N., Kolo, F., Gukguk, Y. C. N. A. B. R., & Kristian, A. (2025). Strategi manajemen risiko operasional dan reputasi dalam menghadapi dinamika pasar global: Studi kasus Nestlé. Journal of Economics, Management, and Accounting, 1(1), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.65310/rtw37m68
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. SAGE Publications.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
UNCTAD. (2026). Hormuz disruption deepens global economic strain across trade, prices and finance. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/news/hormuz-disruption-deepens-global-economic-strain-across-trade-prices-and-finance
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). SAGE Publications.